Weasleyfanforever
22-07-2005, 09:24
We have been told over and over again how everything in the Harry Potter realm is down to choices. The only real illustration of this mantra was Severus Snape. He served under Lord Voldemort as a Death Eater for at least a couple of years, and upon realizing that his actions helped bring the death of classmates of his, he reverted to the good side, serving Dumbledore as a spy on Voldemort, and being the only character in the series so far that has actually played true to what we have been told over and over again: That it is our choices who make us who we are.
Snape was the prime example, he had led a dark life: He lived in a home where abuse was common, even if only in the verbal form, which is very damaging in it's own right. He didn’t fare much better at school, as he was bullied and tortured. He wasn’t totally innocent though, we now know that he created spells to hurt people, and he wasn’t always bullied just because he was there, he attacked of his own free will as well. After high school he went on to join the Death Eaters, and serve Voldemort.
We all know how the story goes; He went to Dumbledore pleading for a job, and claiming that he had seen the error of his ways, and his goal now was to eradicate the Dark forces that surrounded them all. So, of all the characters, Snape has been the only one that has really showed us that it is down to choices. His home life, how he was treated at school, joining the ranks of the Death eaters, and then choosing to join the good side and Dumbledore were the perfect example of choice reining.
But in one fell swoop, that whole ideology of ‘choices’ was destroyed. Snape had never really come over to the good side, he was pretending all along. He wasn’t the one that proved the case; he was the exception to it. Sure, we had Sirius, but Sirius was only suspected of being bad, he never was a killer; he didn’t have to change his spots. Some might point out that Hagrid would make a good case as well, but I would argue against that. A loving father raised Hagrid, and once his father was gone, he had Dumbledore, the greatest wizard of the times to watch over him. Not until Goblet of Fire was he ever the target of prejudice, so that wasn’t a factor in his childhood either. So how are we supposed to believe that ‘choices’ are what it is all about, when it has been proven to us time and time again that the way you are raised plays a large part of who you become?
Snape was the prime example, he had led a dark life: He lived in a home where abuse was common, even if only in the verbal form, which is very damaging in it's own right. He didn’t fare much better at school, as he was bullied and tortured. He wasn’t totally innocent though, we now know that he created spells to hurt people, and he wasn’t always bullied just because he was there, he attacked of his own free will as well. After high school he went on to join the Death Eaters, and serve Voldemort.
We all know how the story goes; He went to Dumbledore pleading for a job, and claiming that he had seen the error of his ways, and his goal now was to eradicate the Dark forces that surrounded them all. So, of all the characters, Snape has been the only one that has really showed us that it is down to choices. His home life, how he was treated at school, joining the ranks of the Death eaters, and then choosing to join the good side and Dumbledore were the perfect example of choice reining.
But in one fell swoop, that whole ideology of ‘choices’ was destroyed. Snape had never really come over to the good side, he was pretending all along. He wasn’t the one that proved the case; he was the exception to it. Sure, we had Sirius, but Sirius was only suspected of being bad, he never was a killer; he didn’t have to change his spots. Some might point out that Hagrid would make a good case as well, but I would argue against that. A loving father raised Hagrid, and once his father was gone, he had Dumbledore, the greatest wizard of the times to watch over him. Not until Goblet of Fire was he ever the target of prejudice, so that wasn’t a factor in his childhood either. So how are we supposed to believe that ‘choices’ are what it is all about, when it has been proven to us time and time again that the way you are raised plays a large part of who you become?