kashlie
25-08-2005, 15:19
Here is my theory....
We know that something happened to Dumbledore's hand when he found the ring, and we also know that it could not be healed.
We also know that Snape can 'put a stopper in death'.
Well, here is what I am thinking - the protection on the ring causes a reaction that kills whomever touches it, starting with the point of contact -
Dumbledore touches it, his hand starts dying and slowly spreads upwards, but he has enough time to break the protection on the ring, and get to Snape. The injury can't be healed, but the effect can be stopped...or slowed at least...
I think the effect was merely paused, or slowed even further, when Snape helped him. Realising he was going to die, Dumbledore decided to give Harry all the information he could, so that he may continue. He made plans with Snape, that if it should come to it, Snape should be the one to kill him (whether or not Dumbledore was told of the Unbreakable Vow, I think it was Snape's job to kill Dumbledore...maybe the curse on the ring would turn DD into an Inferi or something).
Dumbledore knows he has nothing to lose when he drinks the potion in the cave. And I believe that when faced by Draco on the tower, he was still the man we knew, and didn't want Draco to become a killer, or to have to attack him, or Snape to die because of the Vow, so pleaded with Snape to do it then and there.
I think Harry's whole year changed because DD underestimated the protection around that particular Horcrux, and I guess he might have died hoping Harry would realise how dangerous his mission was going to be.
*supporting evidence that the curse could slowly kill is the effect of the necklace on Katie - Snape was able to stop that curse from spreading. Riddle could have been the one to put the curse on that necklace, as he did on the ring.
We know that something happened to Dumbledore's hand when he found the ring, and we also know that it could not be healed.
We also know that Snape can 'put a stopper in death'.
Well, here is what I am thinking - the protection on the ring causes a reaction that kills whomever touches it, starting with the point of contact -
Dumbledore touches it, his hand starts dying and slowly spreads upwards, but he has enough time to break the protection on the ring, and get to Snape. The injury can't be healed, but the effect can be stopped...or slowed at least...
I think the effect was merely paused, or slowed even further, when Snape helped him. Realising he was going to die, Dumbledore decided to give Harry all the information he could, so that he may continue. He made plans with Snape, that if it should come to it, Snape should be the one to kill him (whether or not Dumbledore was told of the Unbreakable Vow, I think it was Snape's job to kill Dumbledore...maybe the curse on the ring would turn DD into an Inferi or something).
Dumbledore knows he has nothing to lose when he drinks the potion in the cave. And I believe that when faced by Draco on the tower, he was still the man we knew, and didn't want Draco to become a killer, or to have to attack him, or Snape to die because of the Vow, so pleaded with Snape to do it then and there.
I think Harry's whole year changed because DD underestimated the protection around that particular Horcrux, and I guess he might have died hoping Harry would realise how dangerous his mission was going to be.
*supporting evidence that the curse could slowly kill is the effect of the necklace on Katie - Snape was able to stop that curse from spreading. Riddle could have been the one to put the curse on that necklace, as he did on the ring.